AI visibility report: evidence before the verdict
This public sample uses a real Awesome.Digital-owned property to show the report shape. It separates what the site is ready to do from what search engines and AI systems have actually done.
This is a fixed, dated sample—not a live dashboard. Its evidence does not update automatically. Run a new scan for current evidence about your site.
Dated sample snapshot
Strong foundation, uneven distribution
Readiness is a leading indicator. Search and citation outcomes are lagging evidence. They are deliberately not blended into one success claim.
Site readiness
72.2/100
Leading indicator · structure and query fit
Search outcomes
35.2/100
Lagging indicator · measured visibility
Model-check citations
18 / 117
Stored checks · last run June 28
Observed AI citations
14
Bing Copilot · 7 distinct URLs
Evidence, interpretation, next test
What the numbers actually support
Demand exists, but clicks are concentrated
The homepage recorded 8,370 impressions, 26 clicks, and an average position of 10.7 in the live 90-day GSC window. The page benchmark found 53 of 56 canonical pages with impressions, but only four with clicks.
Interpretation: publishing coverage is not the same as earning useful visibility. The next test should target distribution, query fit, or authority—not more undifferentiated volume.
One target query still loses clearly
For digital marketing agency, the July 8 exact-rank baseline put Coalition Technologies first and this property outside the top 10. The matching four-model check cited this property zero times.
Interpretation: a good readiness score does not prove competitive reach. The page needs comparable SERP and authority evidence before anyone can claim lift.
Citation traction exists in specific pockets
Stored tests cited the property in 18 of 117 model checks through June 28. Separately, Bing Copilot reported 14 observed citations across seven URLs on April 20. Those are different evidence types and different dates.
Interpretation: the site is not invisible, but older and query-mixed evidence cannot support a claim that a recent intervention caused growth.
Observed citation teaser
Pages AI systems have cited
These are imported Bing Copilot observations, not a fabricated share-of-voice rate. The source and observation date remain attached to the evidence.
One bounded next action
Diagnose the high-readiness, low-traction gap
The marketing automation ROI article scored 94.3 for readiness while its benchmark snapshot held 593 impressions and zero clicks. Inspect the live SERP winners and query fit first, then choose one intervention—intent/title alignment or earned-authority support—and freeze a comparable before/after cohort.
This is a testable hypothesis, not a promise. No ranking or citation lift is claimed until the post-change evidence exists.
Research layer
The engine underneath the report
Site inventory
Canonical pages, redirects, archives, and indexability
Query map
Keyword-to-page fit and competing URLs
Search outcomes
Fresh GSC positions, impressions, and clicks
AI observations
Model checks kept separate from imported citations
Evidence ledger
Source, date, limitation, intervention, and outcome
Evidence ledger
Every number keeps its source and clock
Google Search Console
Live API pull August 14, 2026
90-day query and page window ending August 11
Production page benchmark
Generated August 14, 2026
56 canonical pages after 225 noncanonical URLs were excluded
Stored multi-model checks
Last check June 28, 2026
117 checks across six configured models
Bing Copilot observations
Observed April 20, 2026
14 citations across seven owned URLs
Limitations
What this sample does not claim
- No fresh paid backlink snapshot was purchased for this report.
- GA4 was stale as of August 8, so no current traffic-lift claim appears here.
- Older citation evidence cannot prove a recent page change caused growth.
- Private account details and raw model responses are intentionally omitted.
Your site, your evidence
Start with a free technical preview
Enter a domain to see the first five visibility checks. If you save the snapshot, the same campaign attribution follows the scan into the private magic-link report.